• About
  • Alerts
  • Advertise
  • Events
  • Research
  • Contact
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
Health & Protection
  • PMI & Healthcare
    • Individual
    • SME
    • Large Corporate
    • Cash Plans
    • Hospitals
  • Protection
    • Group Risk
    • Individual Protection
  • International
  • Wellbeing & Mental Health
    • Absence/Productivity
    • Mental Health
    • Services
  • Appointments / Industry
    • Appointments
    • Company News
    • Compliance & Regulation
    • Economy
Health & Protection
No Result
View All Result

Advisers must tread ‘very carefully’ where customers consider cancelling PMI or protection – Bjelobaba

by Graham Simons
24 January 2023
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Advisers need to tread “very carefully” where customers are considering cancelling private medical insurance (PMI) or protection cover as cost of living pressures mount, according to Branko Bjelobaba, principal at consultancy Branko.

He highlighted the risk of customers not being able to secure the same terms if they later wanted to renew their cover as a particular concern given regulatory action.

Bjelobaba (pictured) issued the warning in the wake of the latest Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) statement protecting consumers in financial distress.

Earlier this month the FCA extended measures introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic to now support all insurance customers in financial difficulty whatever the reason last week.

The regulator said it was aiming to reduce the impact of the financial difficulty experienced on the customer, enable the customer to maintain an appropriate level of insurance that they can afford, and reduce the risk of the customer losing appropriate insurance cover that is important to them.

Speaking to Health & Protection, Bjelobaba described the regulator’s action as “sensible”, but added that as PMI and protection cover were discretionary purchases, they could be the first things customers sought to get rid of as cost of living pressures mounted.

But he warned this could be a poor choice with significant unintended consequences given the longer-term implications and so advisers needed to be very clear in their conversations.

“It is not a good idea as you may not be able to get back on the same terms or cost, so advisers need to think very carefully regarding the advice they give to their clients,” Bjelobaba continued.

“It is a new risk – with terms issued as at that date, so if they’ve had claims or such and are more impaired, they will be paying more.”

 

Next Post

Allianz Partners UK&I appoints chief sales and distribution officer from RAC

Alan Fergusson leaves WBN

Tory rejection of workplace menopause support for discriminating against men is 'grasping at straws' - Nokes

Health & Protection iPMI Summit

VIDEO

UK Health & Protection Awards:
Entry Tips - Elliott Hurst

HAVE YOU READ?

Fear of ‘dismal’ year but advisers told to seek new methods for growth – analysis

30 January 2023

Read more

Dr Subashini M returns to Aviva targeting cancer costs and increasing PMI demand

25 January 2023

Read more
Health & Protection

© 2021 Definite Article Limited. Design by Bedazzled Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Healthcare & Protection

X
No Result
View All Result
  • Home

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.